on campus event and off campus event

For my on campus event I chose to go to one of the presidential brown bag lunches. I chose this because I wanted to expose myself to some ideas that were against my political beliefs. I think that I sometimes only talk about politics with the friends that I know will agree with me and only read about the news from sources that advocate a liberal agenda. However, I really do believe that it is important to spend time listening (open-mindedly) to people who have differing opinions because it is a good way to discuss and understand why I feel the way I do. Unfortunately this event was not as much a stretch for me as I would have liked, as all of the speakers strongly supported Obama over McCain and there was little if any discussion of areas in which McCain might be more qualified or reasons why one might wish to vote for him. Because of this disappointing result I chose to watch the election results on November 4 with a group of friends that included a McCain supporter. I found that this experience produced some of the results that I had hoped for when I attended the presidential brown bag lunch discussion. For instance I was reminded about how important I think it is that people of all political orientations work together. I feel that the smugness and superiority that often comes with being a part Washington’s party in power is often very damaging and stands in the way of our government being productive. Additionally, I think that the goals of the American people are in many areas the same for most people, with the real disagreement lying in how to accomplish these goals. During this election I have been rather upset with how much we as a society have been vilifying the members of the parties who oppose our political beliefs. I am as guilty for doing this as anyone else is, however I feel that this is something we should strive to move away from in the future. The conversations that I had while watching election results with friends that have opposing beliefs gave me hope that this is possible.

I don’t really know much about the city of Georgetown, especially in the political realm, I don’t know if we have a mayor, or who that person might be and I don’t know what propositions or ballot initiatives were decided during the election, because I voted by absentee. I feel bad that I am so uninformed about the town in which I live, so I decided to attend a public meeting of some sort in Georgetown for my off campus event. I chose to attend the Georgetown Municipal Airport Advisory Committee meeting. I pick this event because I didn’t even know Georgetown had an airport (also, to be honest, it was at a more convenient time for me than some other meetings). The meeting was held at a firehouse right next to the airport at 7 on a Monday night. The main question under discussion at this meeting was about the lease for the land the airport is on. As I understood the situation the land is leased from Georgetown for the airport to be able to operate. The board members were discussing if they wished to renew the lease with the same terms that they had had before or if they wanted to renegotiate it. I thought that this was particularly interesting because it is not at all how I would have imagined such a decision being made. It was by no means an elaborate legal process including polling about how individuals felt about the decision. Instead each of the members gave their opinions and it was fairly quickly decided that the lease would be renewed as it was before. I really enjoyed seeing the legislative process on such a small scale with just a few people in a room talking about what they thought would work best. It certainly seemed more reasonable and humane than some of the debates that occur between legislators in Washington.